Through hours of internal/external debate, and what I consider “Starbucks Discussion” (what Mike and I ponder on our weekly coffee drive) over the years, I think what has changed is my opinion of the power of personal accountability. I have been around the block and have seen many things I never thought possible – both on the brighter and darker side of human behavior. Thus my respect for the power we have to choose, to decide to do what is right, to understand fully that our integrity must remain intact regardless of the net gain for ourselves in the areas of business, finances, social standing, etc. has grown immensely.
![]() |
| Thomas Hobbes |
In revisiting my thinking, I remembered a previous discussion and found I should locate a book by Steven Pinter called The Blank Slate. It may or may not be of value, I'll let you know! What I do know is there are some helpful excerpts from the book that add perspective; Bloggers have pit Thomas Hobbes against Jean-Jacques Rousseau as a result of it. Remembering from philosophy studies Hobbes stated that primitive human life (or natural man) was "solitary, poor, nasty, brutish, and short" - in other words generally depraved, he takes a negative view and leaves civilization in a position to be good. Ultimately it rescues us from ourselves and teaches us how to behave.
![]() |
| Jean-Jacques Rousseau |
In contrast Jean-Jacques Rousseau, the enlightenment philosopher who influenced the French revolution with the book The Social Contract, felt we humans were in early times "noble beasts" (LOL) that civilization had corrupted. Arguing that we should seek to restore conditions to more of a natural rather than technological life, he felt this is what would help us get back to our good nature (so to speak).
While I am not trying to engage in debate, or trying to demonstrate who is right or wrong in my opinion, Hobbes = Human nature is BAD and Civilization is GOOD or Rousseau = Human Nature is GOOD and civilization is BAD, what I wrestle with is on a different level and deals with personal accountability. If I were having a philosophical conversation (oh yes, I guess I am) I would pose the following questions.
"What if we are bad and civilization is bad" OR "What if we are good and civilization is good"?
The reality that hard work and perseverance pays honorable dividends over the long term and shortcuts will more often than not lead to hollow, temporary victories that can possibly defame our character only prove that civilization (if bad) has proven to be the stronger in its ability to corrupt us (if we are good). On the other hand, seeking to aquire unearned gains that compromise our integrity may very well demonstrate that if we are truly bad the goodness of civilization is powerless to overcome our nature - both to the same end.
Either way, I come to this conclusion. Regardless of what is true or false, partially or completely, how we were raised, what we believe to be the truth, what we think we know, etc., it is the choice we make ourselves that shapes who we become. The choice is simple: in our core we must deliberately embrace the good, wherever it originates, placing others before ourselves, striving to help them succeed and celebrating alongside them when they do. We must stand pure in our resolve in the face of high-tech and aggressive competition and stay the course of doing what is right, getting ahead while honoring an internal code of ethics we establish for ourselves that is not conditional. What matters is we do have the power to make society, or ourselves, good if we choose to be people of integrity and honor. A CEO mentor of mine once said, "Do what is right. Do what is right for the business. Do what is right." My thoughts this week boil down to this: Search yourself and you will know what is true - embrace it and don't worry about what the "other guy" is doing. That is, as my teenage son says, NMP (not my problem). Take the high road and do what is right, always, and you will become your highest and best.

